|
If I were to choose a person from the last hundred years of history
and select a single event that analogously represents what Mr Blair
has shown himself to be, it would be a member of the crew who manned
the Titanic. Not one of the noble ones, I hasten to add, who stood
by their posts prepared to go down with the ship as they helped
passengers climb aboard the life boats but one who would be prepared
to dress up in a women’s dress, push his way to the front
of the life boat station and smack people round the head with whatever
oar might be available, so that what he considered to be his personal
life boat wouldn’t sink. Thus he would reach the safety of
the home straight situated on the other side of the election channel
although at present this channel must look more the stretch of water
between the rocks of Cylla and Charybdis from Homers Odyssey than
the innocuous waves of the English Channel. Needless to say there
is no similarity whatsoever between Tony Blair and Odysseus. Tony
Blair plays vicarious soldiering with the same ignorance that Mr
Bush displayed on May 2nd 2003 when he gave his infamous speech
aboard the USS Lincoln “Fellow Americans operations in Iraq
have ended …the United States and our Allies have prevailed”.
Definitely not the most perspicacious observation but one that has
a sense of the bizarre equalled in quality by Blair’s natural
flair for mendacity which competes with any of the histrionic political
farces that Bush has directed. George Bush is no hero and likewise
neither is Tony Blair, except perhaps in the eyes of Cherie and
the numerous women from the suburbs who are infiltrating every department
in the upper echelons of his cabinet. It is fairly obvious that
Blair feels safer among the ever increasing number of skirts which
swirl in the Cabinet room where new in house labour treachery can
strikes at any moment with the venom of pre-emption. Real men who
have ethics like Robin Cook had, clearly frighten him which is why
he selects his lieutenants carefully and gets rid of them when their
existence becomes an embarrassment and a danger to his own seat
on the throne of power. There is nothing safer for a man than to
surround himself by ordinary but pushy, ambitious women who have
nothing to fear from the testosterone male! Such a ploy is even
safer than encouraging a coterie of old friends and acquaintances
who often have the longest knives of all. Blair’s babes aren’t
exactly powerful operators but they certainly move about from one
ministry to the next and some lucky ones get elevated into the House
of Lords when it becomes obvious that their value has zeroed ,Estelle
Morris being a prime example. Blair selects and disposes with the
tyranny of a 19th century Victorian. He might have a smile and appear
to have a twinkle in his eye but do they relate to the word sincerity?
Not in the opinion of a vast number of the voters . The recent Blair
version of the night of long knives was pretty callous and if, in
his eyes, he is the 21st century Caesar, he is certainly making
sure there is no Brutus lurking behind him on the front steps of
the stage where the latest obfuscating political farce is produce.
Blair the mafia boss of New Labour waits and watches and plunges
the knife before any potential Brutus can sharpen his dagger and
hide it among his person until he is ready to stab.
So where do we go from here? As the first decade of the 21st century
yawns into the part 2 we have new boy David Cameron, Sir Menzies
Campbell and Gordon Brown all dreaming of the same goal. To move
into No 10 and all that entails. Unless Tony Blair stops taking
his pills which he must be very close to taking, I don’t think
even he will risk going for a fourth term of office. Sir Menzies
Campbell is a gentleman of the old order which is more than I can
say about Cameron for all his Etonian / Oxbridge passport advantages.
Unfortunately, Sir Menzies lacks the dynamism that will impress
the public enough to induce them to put a cross against his name
at the next general election. Add that to the discrimination against
old age and Sir Menzies is a dead duck in the water although it
must be said that if Sir Menzies ,or Ming as he likes to be called,
were to become prime minister he would make a better one than either
Gordon Brown or David Cameron .
And, speaking of Cameron, man of the people with open shirt and
a bike to ride, good choreography but will these distinguishing
qualities get him into number ten? Yes, it is possible that he might
make it although the unctuous manner and “I am one of you”
style of hustings will only fool a percentage of the voters. Regrettably
those who aren’t taken in by his calculated activities and
speeches are more than likely to represent the almost 60 percent
of the polling list who wont vote because of their burnt out political
souls which never caught fire in the first place ! The political
apathy of the English is incredibly powerful in its implied negativity
and yet as students the British are capable of violence and social
disruption until they are finally absorbed into the establishment
and become tame and emasculated, desperately trying to catch up
with the image of the middle classes.
In the last six months I have been to two serious conferences. The
Annual General meeting of the Fabian Society in January and the
recent Power Commission conference at the Elizabethan Hall beside
Parliament Square. At the Fabian Society Gordon Brown made long
speech in which he basically set out his concept of politics according
to the Gospel of Brown, heir apparent to the throne of power. It
was a long speech for which the applause was proportionately long
and sustained but it was a “look at me, look at me, hear what
I say, wouldn’t I make a great Prime Minister?" type
of speech that we all made as children when seeking approval. He
even cracked his lugubrious face into a simulacrum of a smile. A
rarity indeed not often observed by the public who are used to an
occasional front bench lip stretch and a flash of his teeth . Brown
also flew the Union Jack at the back of the Fabian stage to keep
up with the BNP party hoping to show that the pride of England was
not an emblem exclusive to the BNP party whose political rumblings
seem to be putting the fear of god into the present relatively new
establishment. Brown spoke as if he had it in the bag but I am not
so sure. He has made similar speeches before .
At the Power Commission conference both Cameron and Sir Menzies,
two contestant “heir apparents” to the throne of power,
had obviously, at the last moment obtained a high profile promulgation
speech slot and were able to give their respective new political
images to an enraptured audience who were members of the public,
thirsty for change in style and governance. People with new and
fresh dreams, ready to be motivated by the heady words of political
rhetoric, wanting to believe that England was on the pivotal moment
of 21st century politics and at the brink of the next stage of political
evolution . Sir Menzies’ speech contained the mellow words
of political wisdom by someone who had been there before and would
give his pragmatism to the office of Prime minister if the public
were to choose him in the next General Election. I believed in his
sincerity which I didn’t feel was present in the first speech
of the conference during which David Cameron promised the earth
and went through the full gamut of political fantasies with something
for everyone like a Father Christmas playing out the fantasy factor
in Harrod’s Christmas grotto.
Cameron was going to make right all the wrongs in our society if
he got into office and listening to his carefully honed script I
had the impression of a man born with the privilege of wealth getting
carried away with his own fantasies which are easily acquired if
one has the privileges that come with money, the right connections
and the silver spoon is present at birth. I also wondered who had
written his speech and what group of advisors had fed the magic
formula to the speech writer. But I wasn’t convinced that
this was a man who knew , who understood, who sincerely empathised
with the man in the street. He might have his own personal problems
but the very style he is adopting indicates that he has been briefed
of the political necessities of which he must be aware. It must
be understood that being technically aware does not give the empathy
which is required to produce efficacious policies and a government
which will cure the ailments of a society.
George Osborne his shadow Chancellor side kick, gives me a similar
but even more apprehensive feeling. The recent inclusion of Zac
Goldsmith puts the finishing touch to this merry band of privileged
men dedicated to eliminate poverty and endorses John Prescott’s
appropriate nomenclature when he said “ these members of the
“Old Etonian mafia” And as with all mafia groups what
they say is the way they will insist that things will be. Apparently
they have the answers but then doesn’t everyone who aspires
to be Prime Minister and isn’t it a fact that the big mouth
who claims to have the answers is more than likely to resemble the
self invented war hero who never stops talking about his incredible
bravery which didn’t actually exist as opposed to the genuine
war hero who did perform feats of personal bravery doesn’t
talk about it, blow his trumpet or repeat after the second whiskey,
how he and his friends won the war single handed.
Cameron and his buddies are all there waiting impatient to go into
action but there is something troubling me. Is it the bumptiousness
of Osborne or the humility of David Cameron and that I find unnerving.
For someone who was going to put an end to the ya booing in the
house he seems to have picked up the habit rather well. Cameron
is young enough to believe what he says but not old enough to know
that his words are simply the regurgitated bull shit which politicians
have been saying for over a hundred years. Every generation thinks
they have discovered sex and in a similar vein it rather looks as
though the new boy in the chamber thinks he has discovered the ultimate
panacea of all political ailments.
Copyright Dorian van
Braam May 2006
|
|
|